First of all, the general impression they give in the article is that the haven’t have really looked at any of the two OS-es and just copied this article from an English site. Second, it seems terribly biased towards Android.
For brevity sake let’s only look at the table, based on which they compare the two OS-es:
Multitasking:
iOS4: multitasking met applicaties in de achtergrond mogelijk (in zoverre Apple het toestaat)
Apple allows unlimited applications in the background, the question is whether the developer supports it. Only one application of one type can really run in the background. Why would you want two music applications running at the same time?
Android 2.2: onbeperkte multitasking mogelijk (een onbeperkt aantal applicaties open kan echter leiden tot traagheid)
Unlimited here means: Until your memory is full, which is more quickly than with iOS4. Besides just like iOS4 it isn’t really multitasking. Android saves the application’s state, just as much as IOS4 does (when the developer builds that in).
The real winner is: neither one of them, both implementations have their pros and cons.
Internet and browsing:
iOS4: ingebouwde Safari-browser; geen Flash-support
Android 2.2: Android browser; Flash 10.1-support.
Both browsers are based on WebKit, Apple’s open-source browser engine. For many many websites you don’t need Flash.
The real winner is: iOS4, because Android 2.2 is using Apple’s browser engine and if you would just take a look at how Flash is running on your mobile (battery and performance wise) – it’s terrible!
Social networking:
iOS4: Applicaties voor Facebook, Twitter etc. zijn beschikbaar, maar niet standaard ingebouwd
Android 2.2: standaard met Google IM-applicatie en GoogleTalk, applicaties voor andere sociale netwerken apart installeren
The real winner: Neither one, Google IM is the same as GoogleTalk, there is no difference. Besides not all users may want to have a social networking application installed. Also GoogleTalk isn’t social networking it’s a instant messenger, much like SMS or iChat/ICQ.
Navigation:
iOS4: Google Maps, aparte navigatie-applicatie benodigd
Android 2.2: gratis meegeleverde navigatie met Google Maps Navigatie
So here the Android 2.2 OS steps ahead a bit. iOS4 doesn’t come with navigation.
Music:
iOS4: veel muziek in inTunes Store, playlist-support, Genius-modus
A non iPod / iPhone / iTunes user wouldn’t know what Genius-mode is, luckily it’s explained below the table, but there they also mention:
bijna al het synchroniseren in Android via de ‘cloud’ (dat wil zeggen: online), waardoor een mobiel data-abonnement eigenlijk onmisbaar is.
Ehrrr, wait, for Navigation with Google Maps you would also require a data-subscription. So why mention this with navigation as a “benefit” (and let Android come out more positive) and now let it come out as a negative thing?
Android 2.2: MP3’s afspelen mogelijk maar goede muziekprogramma’s alleen via derde partijen
Perhaps just playing MP3’s (and loads of other formats) is enough for most users? For business users it’s certainly not interesting.
Winner: iOS4 if you want to play music, otherwise it’s not really relevant.
Apps:
If you look at this article, Google’s Android market isn’t getting closer at all. In fact, Apple’s AppStore has 10.000 apps per month more growth. However the quantity of the applications isn’t really relevant, it’s the quality. In the Android Market you’ll see a lot of duplicate and rip-off apps. Also Google has demonstrated that it will occasionally remove applications from the phone. This is something that Apple can also do, however hasn’t done yet.
Devices:
iOS4: iPhone 4, updates voor iPhone 3G en iPhone 3GS
Android 2.2: updates voor Google Nexus One, HTC Desire en veel andere Android-smartphones
Basically you can run Android on your mom’s toaster. Apple and Google have a very different goal with their OS-es. Apple builds iOS for you and me, Google builds it for the phone-manufacturers. A HTC Android phone looks and behaves very different than a Android phone from Sony Ericsson. Perhaps even so different that an average user will need to get used to it all over again if he/she switches manufacturers. With Apple’s iPhone this is not the case.
Original Article